Statistical data
Away from fourteen issues of cervical disease evaluation, female whose score was basically ? ten had been randomly categorized given that with ‘an effective knowledge’ normally have been thought to be that have “negative knowledge”. To own experience with HPV, female whoever respond to is actually ‘never ever heard about HPV’ had been omitted on data out of HPV education.
Out-of 5 inquiries, women whoever get was in fact ? 3 was basically considered as having ‘a expertise in HPV’ otherwise while the ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Off 19 concerns, women whoever score had been ? 13 have been classified once the with ‘a total knowledge’ or else because the ‘bad total knowledge’.
All analysis was in fact obtained into the a digital database and you may reviewed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to research group study and you will was in fact summarized once the number having percentage, imply with fundamental departure otherwise median having variety. The fresh new association between for each and every changeable and education get had been examined playing with easy linear regression. Exploratory model was developed inside the multivariable study and all details probably linked to the information rating. The latest felt quantity of statistical benefits was an excellent p-value of 0.05 otherwise shorter.
Show
Out-of five-hundred women that met addition standards and you will had been anticipate with the research, one ong 499 ladies who responded to the fresh new survey in the studies of cervical cancers and screening (part II) and you can understanding of HPV (part II), several did not promote personal data. Therefore market data were found in simply 497 women (Table step 1). The fresh suggest period of 497 players is decades (SD ± ). More than half of the users were aged Table step 1. Socio-financial characteristic (Letter = 497).
The latest symptoms to own colposcopy was basically irregular cervical cytology with exposure from HR-HPV (155; 30.2%), unpredictable cytology with negative or unfamiliar out-of Time-Hp (274; 55.1%), exposure out of only Hours-HPV (65; 13.1%), or simply history of CIN (3; 0.6%) (Dining table 2).
According to for every single concern on the cervical cancer evaluation (Desk step 3), 95.4% from 499 female misunderstood that all women shall be screened getting cervical disease (Q 1). Around 55% to help you 70% understood when to initiate and you can regularity from evaluation (Q dos–4). Although not, only 17.4% and you can thirty-six.3%were aware this new assessment was not needed then–immediately following hysterectomy having non-cervical disease (Q 5) otherwise once 65 ages which have reputation for consecutively regular past comparison (Q six).
To your methods of evaluation (Q 7–14), 79% away from members was indeed aware that there were many examination steps (Q eight). not, only eight.2% got training one to cervical examination was over at that time off pelvic test (Q 8). The participants was basically always cervical cytologic assessment (Q 10; 93.8%), HPV comparison (Q eleven; 89.2%), co-evaluation (Q several; ninety-five.4%) however having graphic review once acetic acid (VIA) which had https://getbride.org/da/blog/postordrebrude-prisfastsaettelse/ been identified in just 29.7% (Q nine). Furthermore, 57.7% and 65.3% of members got myth you to cervical malignant tumors screening is complete because of the imaging (Q 13) and you may blood attempt to own tumor markers (Q fourteen), correspondingly.
For knowledge of HPV, 110 professionals (20.0%) got never observed HPV. Among remaining 389 participants, majority (92.5%) knew one HPV infection are preventable and you may 85.1% had been conscious it’s avoidable from the vaccination. Even if bulk (90.5%) understood one to cervical malignant tumors stems from oncogenic HPV, merely approximately half realized that it could be avoided by steering clear of sexual pastime otherwise venereal wart comes from non-oncogenic HPV.
I analyzed knowledge of the players by the score (Table 4). The fresh indicate many professionals to own knowledge of cervical cancer evaluating (N = 499) and of HPV (N = 389) were ± dos.37 (of 14 concerns) and step three.53 ± 1.11 (off 5 inquiries), correspondingly. Of the categorization, 26.9% and you will 20.1% had good expertise in cervical cancer testing and you will HPV correspondingly. The new mean sum score of knowledge from the cervical disease assessment and you may HPV was basically ± dos.87 (away from 19 questions), with only 25.2% had a overall training.